Lenin’s legacy

Posted on 06 October 2005 by Andy

Sean has been wondering whether it would be a good idea to bury Lenin or not, and he concludes with an interesting idea on Lenin’s importance in Russia, an idea not commonly heard in the West:

I think what Lenin stands for is changing in Russia. For better or for worse, he is becoming more like Peter the Great: a firm and decisive, but necessary ruler who thrust Russia into modernity. But that is historical memory for you. A new historical narrative emerges at the moment of forgetting. Even the Lenins of the world can find their place in the genealogy of the present.

I think he’s probably correct and, further, I think Stalin is beginning to be viewed in the same light.

What next?

Related posts:

    Stalin in London
    Art and Lenin
    Siberian Light on the Stock Market
    Lenin speaks…
    The Other Ruler of North Korea


2 Comments For This Post

  1. Tim Newman Says:

    Russia is in such a state of confusion at the moment that they are clinging desperately to anything which reminds them of a time of perceived normalcy, even if this means whitewashing historical figures to suit.

  2. Lloyd Says:

    Ivan the Terrible, Peter the Great, Lenin and Stalin. One mass murderer after another yet all rehabilitated after death because they “changed Russia toward modernization”?

    Can we have a Russian Thomas Edison for once, instead?

Advertise Here
Advertise Here

INFORMATION