Archive | January, 2008

Tags: ,

Europe’s Language Map

Posted on 31 January 2008 by Andy

I stumbled across this fascinating map of Europe’s languages the other day - each colour represents a different language.

Languages of Europe Map

Russia is by far the most linguistically diverse country in Europe. As well as Russian, I counted eight different languages within the European borders of Russia - plus there are who knows how many more distinct languages spoken in Siberia and the Far East.

Few other countries seem to have more than one or two native languages - Romania heads up the rest of the pack with, by my count, six native languages.

And also Russia seems to be one of the most widespread first languages outside of its home country. From what I can tell, it has spread to seven different European countries - Kazakhstan, Ukraine, Belarus, Latvia, Estonia, Romania and Finland.

You can see a larger version of this map at Wikipedia Commons.

Comments (10)

Tags: ,

Impersonators of Russian and Soviet leaders

Posted on 29 January 2008 by Andy

I’m not quite sure what to make of this short video clip of various impressionists (to be charitable) of Russian and Soviet leaders.

Vladimir Putin looks quite chipper, I suppose, but V.I. Lenin looks terribly depressed to me.

Comments Off

Top 5 Russia Blogs

Posted on 28 January 2008 by Andy

There have been a few attempts to provide a statistical ranking of the top Russia blogs. But, for some reason, everyone except the blogger who tops the list complains that they aren’t accurate.

So, I thought I’d have a go at putting together a list of the Top 5 Russia blogs and, mindful of this problem, decided to base my list purely on my own subjective opinion. Not a statistic in sight.

Here, in no particular order, is my selection of the Top 5 Russia Blogs - the most influential, the most interesting and sometimes the most controversial Russia blogs out there. Feel free to disagree in the comments…

Sean’s Russia Blog

Seans Russia BlogIf you’re looking for serious, but readable commentary on Russia, Sean’s Russia Blog is the place to go.

The only academic in my Top 5 and (if you count La Russophobe as a group blog) the only solo blogger as well, Sean’s Russia Blog combines academic rigour with an accessible, easy to read style. Sean’s Russia Blog is also the longest running blog in my list, having been publishing on and off since October 2004 - that’s almost as long as Siberian Light.

Oh, and if you’e looking for information about Youth Politics in Russia (or punks, for that matter), Sean knows all there is to know…

La Russophobe

La RussophobeFor almost two years now, the burning question on everyone’s lips has been… is La Russophobe a CIA agent pushing anti-Russian propaganda, or is she just a deranged lunatic with a grudge against Russian tennis players and way too much time on her hands?

Nobody knows, but everyone seems to have an opinion.

La Russophobe burst onto the scene almost two years ago and has been spewing out a frankly stunning quantity of anti-Russian rhetoric ever since. Nothing and no-one Russian escapes her biting criticism - Russia itself, Putin, Sharapova, and any blogger unfortunate enough to get in her way. Pretty much everyone associated with Russia and in the public eye (including me) has, at one time or another, been on the end of a La Russophobe spanking.

La Russophobe could not be a more combative blogger if she tried.

But, love her or hate her, La Russophobe has become easily one of the most influential, not to mention prolific, bloggers about Russia. Day in, day out (except Thanksgiving), the vitriolic anti-Russian posts keep flowing. Offensive they may be, but they often contain enough of a kernel of truth to force Russophiles to sit back and consider just how accurate their cherished beliefs are.

Russia Blog

Russia BlogRussia Blog is perhaps the most pro-Kremlin of the blogs in this list, but it is also the blog that brings the widest range of voices to our attention, with commentary from experts and other bloggers, as well as its own in house editorial team of Yuri Mamchur and Charles Ganske.

One of two group blogs in my list backed by either a business or a policy organisation, Russia Blog often takes some flak for being run by an organisation associated with pro-Creationist views. But I can’t say I’ve ever really Russia Blog covering the creationist debate in Russia. A missed opportunity, perhaps?

Robert Amsterdam

Robert AmsterdamI’ll bet you never knew that Mikhail Khodorkovsky’s lawyer was a blogger? And a prolific one, at that.

As you’d expect from a law firm representing Vladimir Putin’s imprisoned oligarchic opponent, Robert Amsterdam and his team generally take an anti-Kremlin line. But, in contrast to La Russophobe, he also tends to give credit where it is due and the Russian government does something right. It’s just a shame that the opportunity doesn’t crop up all that often…

Like Russia Blog, Robert Amsterdam also showcases other writers, notably investigative journalist Grigory Pasko, and produces some excellent translations of non-English language articles.

English Russia

English RussiaRussia’s a big country but, if something cool happens on the 1/6th of the world’s surface that is Russia, English Russia will be there to cover it.

Mostly filled with photographs and videos, English Russia showcases Russia in its glory, in its shame, and in its epic scale.

And, sometimes we just want to read the funny stuff. Not every blog about Russia has to cover politics…

You want more?

Of course, in a list of just 5 blogs about Russia, I couldn’t cover every blog that I love reading, or give a comprehensive introduction to wide variety of Russia Blogs out there. So, if you’re looking for more reading, or if you just can’t stand the five blogs I’ve picked out, there’s a big list of Russia blogs on the sidebar. Take a look around…

Comments (144)

Russia flexes its military muscle

Posted on 25 January 2008 by Andy

It’s been a busy week for watchers of Russia’s military. Not only has Russia announced the return of military parades to Red Square for the first time since the fall of the Soviet Union, they also launched the largest naval exercise since the end of the Cold War - and off the French coast, no less.

First a run down of the week’s storys, followed by some thoughts on whether Russia is back with a bang, or just sabre-rattling.

Tanks return to Red Square

Soviet Tanks Red SquareAfter the Soviet Union collapsed, the famous military parades through Red Square stopped. There was no fanfare. I guess someone just thought the parades no longer seemed appropriate.

Not any more.

The Russian Defence Ministry have announced that this year’s May Day parade in front of the Kremlin will feature 6,000 marching soldiers, tanks, Topol ICBM missiles and a flypast by 32 Su-27 and MiG-29 fighter planes.

Interestingly, this year’s May Day parade will also be the last parade that Putin watches as Russia’s President.

Major Military Exercise off French coast

Admiral KuznetsovAlso this week comes news of Russia’s largest naval exercise since the end of the Cold War.

A carrier strike group of 11 ships, led by the carrier Admiral Kuznetzov and backed by 47 planes has been firing missiles into the Bay of Biscay.

And, in a development that has not been well received in the (admittedly paranoid) British Press, a pair of Tu-95 strategic bombers flew from Russia, skirting British airspace, to join the strike group and test fire a couple of extra missiles. The planes were shadowed all the way by Norwegian and British interceptors.

Is Russia flexing its military muscle, or just sabre rattling?

Although Russia’s military is undoubtedly stronger than it was, and Russia’s relative power has increased, I still think this is mainly a case of sabre rattling.

Military parades across Red Square are more likely to show the Russian military as a cold war relic than a modern, well trained and well armed professional military. The symbolism is all ‘New Cold War’, and the show is primarily for public consumption in a country that would like to see some evidence of Russia’s much vaunted improved international strength.

The exercise in the Bay of Biscay, on the other hand is at least a concrete demonstration of Russia’s power and reach. There aren’t many countries in the world that could hold a major naval operation just off the French coast. Seen any Chinese naval task forces in the area recently?

But, for all that, NATO will be distinctly unimpressed by the show. The Russians have committed the bulk of their fleet to what is really just a piece of theatre.

Of 300-odd ships in the Russian Navy, only 30 are estimated to be sea-worthy. In effect, Russia was required to commit more than a third of its active navy to this demonstration.

And its far from clear that all the ships are fully seaworthy. As Pavel Felgenhauer, a respected Russian defence analyst notes:

“The Admiral Kuznetsov is due to go in for repairs when it returns home. There are two tugs with it now because everybody understands that it could go bust at any moment.”

There is no way the Russians would commit the Kuznetzov to an actual mission, unless it were a dire emergency. There is no scope for Russia projecting its power in any of the worlds trouble spots for the time being, and certainly no prospect of them supporting the UN in a peace-keeping mission.

Comments (2)

Kasyanov’s Presidency bid hit by criminal investigation

Posted on 23 January 2008 by Andy

Mikhail Kasyanov
Mikhail Kasyanov’s bid for the Russian Presidency appears to have been derailed, following allegations that up to 16% of the 2 million signatures he had collected in support of his nomination are fake.

The allegations, if proved will bring Kasyanov’s candidacy to an abrupt halt. Even if not proved, they will significantly damage his public image - not that he had a particularly positive image to damage in the first place.

Here’s the official view from the Central Election Commission:

“Representatives of presidential candidate Kasyanov received a report at 11:00 a.m. [8:00 a.m. GMT] on the check of the first selection of signatures. Of 400,000 signatures scrutinized, the working group has found 62,265 false or invalid, which is 15.57% of the total.”

Under Russian law, of course, no more than 5% of signatures can be invalid.

Intriguingly, just four hours later it was announced that Andrei Bogdanov, leader of the Democratic Party, had passed the 2 million votes threshold - a mere 3.12 of his supporting signatures were ruled invalid. As it stands, it appears as though he will be the only liberal in a four-strong field of candidates.

Some Random Speculation

Kasyanov, of course, is accusing the Russian authorities of harrassment, and of using dirty tricks in an attempt to derail his campaign. And, to an outside observer, that is, of course, the first thought that springs to mind.

However, although Kasyanov is a former Prime Minister of Russia, he isn’t particularly popular in Russia, and getting 2 million signatures was always going to prove a challenge - let alone 2 million legitimate signatures.

A part of me does wonder just how he managed to get those 2 million signatures, and its feelings like that the Central Election Committee’s will be playing on in making their claims of fraud.

But another thought also occurs. If Kasyanov was finding it tough to get 2 million signatures, how come Andrei Bogdanov, leader of the Democratic Party managed to pull in 2 million signatures with almost no fraud?

The leader of a party who, in December’s national election polled a massive 0.13% of the national vote???

Give me a break.

If I were a cynic, I’d be saying that the Kremlin wanted a pliable no-hoper of a liberal candidate in the Presidential race. That way, they can say to the world “Look! We’re a democracy. There’s a genuine liberal candidate in the Presidential election. And look how few votes he got…!”

Comments (3)

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Khalkhin-Gol: The forgotten battle that shaped WW2

Posted on 21 January 2008 by Andy

Manchuria map

In August 1939, just weeks before Hitler invaded Poland, the Soviet Union and Japan fought a massive tank battle on the Mongolian border - the largest the world had ever seen.

Under the then unknown Georgy Zhukov, the Soviets won a crushing victory at the batte of Khalkhin-Gol (known in Japan as the Nomonhan Incident). Defeat persuaded the Japanese to expand into the Pacific, where they saw the United States as a weaker opponent than the Soviet Union. If the Japanese had not lost at Khalkhin Gol, they may never have attacked Pearl Harbor.

The Japanese decision to expand southwards also meant that the Soviet Eastern flank was secured for the duration of the war. Instead of having to fight on two fronts, the Soviets could mass their troops - under the newly promoted General Zhukov - against the threat of Nazi Germany in the West.

In terms of its strategic impact, the battle of Khalkhin Gol was one of the most decisive battles of the Second World War, but no-one has ever heard of it. Why?

Rising Tensions
It was perhaps not all that surprising that the Soviet Union and Japan, two expansionist powers who just happened to be close neighbours, butted heads in the Mongolian borderlands.

Tensions between the two had been high for decades, and had erupted into open conflict on a number of occasions. Japan had clearly had an edge over Russia during the early part of the 20th century - it had decisively defeated Tsarist Russia in the Russo-Japanese war of 1905 (a conflict most memorable, perhaps, for the Russian Navy’s folly of sailing its entire Baltic fleet around the globe only to be promptly sunk by the Japanese Navy within days of its arrival), and had occupied Vladivostock for several years during the Russian civil war.

But, by the 1930s, the Soviet Union under Stalin was a resurgent power, and had become a major regional rival to the Japanese. The Japanese High Command were particularly concerned about the threat Soviet submarines posed to Japanese shipping, and the ease with which Soviet bombers, operating out of Vladivostok, would be able to reach Tokyo.

Flashpoint

By the late 1930s, both Mongolia and bordering Manchuria (Manchukuo) were Soviet and Japanese puppet states.

NomonhanThe border between the two was hotly disputed. Japanese backed Manchuria claimed that the border ran along the Khalkhin-Gol river, whereas the Mongolians argued that the border actually ran just east of Nomonhan village, some 10 miles east of the river.

Although the two countries had previously fought some minor skirmishes (most notably at Changkufeng/Lake Khasan in 1938, a battle which resulted in more than 2,500 casualties on both sides), the battle of Khalkin Gol was sparked when, on 11 May 1938, a small Mongolian cavalry united entered the disputed area in search of grazing for their horses. They were quickly given a bloody nose and expelled by a larger Manchurian unit but, within days, the Mongolians returned with greater support and forced the Manchurian forces to retreat.

The conflict slowly but gradually escalated until Soviet and Japanese forces were drawn into direct conflict. On 28 May Soviet forces surrounded and destroyed a Japanese reconnaisance unit. The Japanese unit, led by Lt Colonel Yaozo Azuma suffered 63% casualties in total, losing 8 officers and 97 men, plus suffering 34 wounded.

A month of relative quiet followed this battle. But, instead of using the time to consider a peace deal, both sides redoubled their efforts to build up their forces in the region.

Daring Japanese Air Raid

Japanese Ki-27 planeThe quiet was shattered on 27 June by a daring Japanese air-raid on the Soviet air base at Tamsak-Bulak in Mongolia. The unprepared Soviets lost many planes on the ground although, once they got airborne they gave a good account of themselves. Their skill, however, could not prevent the Japanese pilots returning gloriously home, having destroyed twice as many Soviet planes as they had lost themselves.

However, their glory was short-lived. The Imperial Japanese Army Headquarters, based in Tokyo, had not been told of the attack in advance, and was not amused at the local commander’s initiative. When news of the raid reached Tokyo, furious Generals immediately ordered that no further air strikes would be launched - a decision for which Japanese foot-soldiers later paid a high price.

The Japanese ground attack

Despite their decision to withdraw air cover, Tokyo was happy to authorise a land-based operation to “expell the invaders.”

Lt. Gen. Michitaro Komatsubara, well schooled officer, planned a devastating two-pronged assault that would encircle and destroy the Soviet armies and bring him a glorious victory.

Japanese troops Nomonhan Khalkhin GolHis Northern task force launched its first assalt on 1st July. After easily crossing the Khalkhin Gol river, Japanse soldiers drove the Soviet forces from Baintsagan Hill and quickly began to advance southwards. The following day his Southern task force followed them with another massive assault.

However, Komatsubara soldiers were ill-prepared, and not able to take advantage of their early success. Poor logistical planning meant that their supply line across the river consisted of just one pontoon bridge.

Seizing their opportunity, the Soviets under Zhukov quickly rallied 450 tanks for a daring counter-attack. Despite being entirely without infrantry support, they attacked the Japanese task force on three sides, and very nearly encircled them.

By 5 July, the battered Japanese Northern Taskforce had been forced back across the river.

The second Japanese attack

Following the failure of their first attack, the Japanese withdrew and planned their next move. Defeat was not an option for Komatsubara. After giving his soldiers a fortnight to recover, and restock their supplies, he conceived another assault plan - this one relying on brute force.

On 23 July, backed by a massive artillery bombardment, the Japanese threw two divisions of troops at the Soviet forces that had, by now, crossed the river and were defending the Kawatama bridge. wo days of fierce fighting resulted in some minor Japanse advances, but they were unable to break Soviet lines and reach the bridge. Despite thousands of casualties, the battle was effectively a stalemate.

Unable to progress further, and rapidly running out of artillery supplies, the Japanese decided that discretion was the better part of valour, and disengaged to plan a third assault.

The Soviet Counter-attack

Zhukov Khalkhin Gol NomonhanPlanning for a third Japanse assault went well, but the Soviets under Zhukov beat Lt Gen Komatsubara to the punch.

By August 20th, Zhukov had amassed a force of more than 50,000 men, 498 tanks and 250 planes. Matched against him was a similarly sized, but not well armoured Japanese force, that had no idea the Soviet counter-attack was coming.

A classic combined arms assault followed, as thousands of Soviet infantry attacked the Japanese centre, Soviet armour encircled the Japanese flanks, and the Soviet air-force and artillery pounded the Japanese from long-range.

By August 31st, the encircled Japanese force had been decimated and surrounded. A few Japanese units managed to break out of the encirclement, but those who remained followed Japanse martial tradition and refused to surrender.

Zhukov wiped them out with air and artillery attacks.

The conflict ends

Just one day later, half way across the world Hitler and Stalin invaded and carved up Poland.

Despite technically being an ally of Nazi Germany, it became prudent for Stalin to ensure that he Eastern flank was also secure. Rather than advancing to push home their tactical advantage and escalate the conflict, Zhukov’s armies were ordered not to press home their advantage. Instead, they were ordered to dig in and hold their position at Khalkhin Gol - the border they had previously claimed as theirs.

The total number of casualties suffered by each side is far from clear, particularly as neither Imperial Japan nor the Soviet Union were particularly ‘open’ societies.

Official statistics report just over 17,000 Japanese total casualties, compared with around 9,000 on the Soviet side. Some historians claim that Japan lost more than 45,000 men, while the victorious Soviet armies lost a ‘mere’ 17,000 men.

Most likely, as always, the true figure lies somewhere in the middle.

How Khalkhin-Gol changed the course of history

The battle of Khalkhin-Gol decisively showed the expansionist Japanese military that it was not a match for the Soviets - particularly while Japanese forces were still bogged down throughout China. The Soviets under combined their forces to stunning effect, while Japanese tactics remained stuck in a pre-modern mindset that valued honour and personal bravery more highly on the battlefield than massed forces and armour.

When Hitler finally invaded the Soviet Union in 1941 the Japanese, although tempted to join the attack, remembered the lessons of Khalkhin Gol and decided to remain on the sidelines, ensuring that the stretched Soviet military could focus its forces on just one front. This, in turn, meant that Nazi Germany was forced to fight a four year war on two fronts - against the Soviets in the East, and the British and Americans in the West.

Defeat at Khalkhin-Gol can also be seen as a major factor in the Japanese decision to expand into the Pacific. As expansion to the North-West was no longer an option, ill defended and scattered colonial territories made far easier targets. Even the United States was deemed a less formidable adversary than the Soviet Union and, if the Japanse had not lost at Khalkhin-Gol, they would surely have never attacked Pearl Harbour.

However, although the Japanese probably took the sensible strategic course after Khalkhin Gol of targetting a ‘weaker’ opponent, they didn’t learn the combat lessons dealt out by the Soviet army. Honour and bravery remained central to the Japanese military mentality and, once they had recovered from the initial onslaught, the United States and Britain were able to mass their forces and push the Japanese out of the Pacific and back to the Home Islands in one brutal battle after another.

Comments (67)

Russia Blog Roundup 2

Posted on 18 January 2008 by Andy

Every week I plan to provide a roundup of the best blog posts about Russia and its surrounds.

The big story of the past few days has, of course, been the spat between Russia and Britain over British Council offices in St Petersburg and Yekaterinburg (more from Siberian Light here and here).

I wondered whether Russia had ‘won’ this round of the ongoing Russo-British feud but, actually, I think Red Exile has absolutely nailed it with his summary of the outcome - a tie:

Seen from the perspective of us Brits living in Moscow, this looks like a classic UK New Labour spin doctor’s game: adopt a position certain to provoke a Russian reaction and then pretend to ‘take the moral high-ground’ and spin out how – while not conceding Moscow’s point – London has shut down the two complained of offices (as initially instructed) ‘in the interests of staff safety’. It is exactly how I would have played it. As chess moves go, there have been no missteps here, by either side. This game has played out in a way that each side can exploit to the full.

I was also amused by Robert Amsterdam’s wry observation of Russia’s approach to disuptes:

It’s difficult to think of any other government that actually threatens to “invent” new tax issues as a way to leverage their interests.

David McDuff has spotted what appears to be a concerted and perhaps pre-planned campaign by Russian activists:

An interesting feature of the present crisis, which was obviously prepared in advance by the Russian authorities, is the flooding of British media comments boards (the Mail and Telegraph are the two leading examples at present) with anti-UK and pro-Putin messages posted by Russians posing under English-sounding names.

It’s not all about the British Council though, so moving right along, Moscow Through Brown eyes considers migration and racism in Russia.

It’s hard to imagine that 2008 won’t give 2007 a run for its money as the bloodiest year for ethnically-motivated violence in Russia.

A blogger visits the Chernobyl exclusion zone. (Via MoldovAnn).

The last 12 months in Central Asia, viewed through the lens of NewEurasia.

The Streetwise Professor asks: “Stalin and Putin: Great Leaders of Great Blunderers?” He opts for the latter, but I was amused by this nice little put-down of Putin:

By comparison to Stalin and his stupendous mistakes, Putin is a piker in the blunder department.

Grigory Pasko wishes Russian prisoners a happy old new year.

And, finally, Svet writes about Russia’s Winnie the Pooh - Vinnih Puh. Don’t forget to watch the video she’s posted.

Comments (1)

Tags: , , , ,

Russia ‘wins’ British Council battle?

Posted on 17 January 2008 by Andy

It looks as though the British Council is going to reluctantly cede to Russian demands that it close its offices in St Petersburg and Yekaterinburg.

According to the BBC, the British Council are to release a statement later today:

A formal statement from the director of the British Council is expected on Thursday.

Sources have told the BBC there does not appear to be much appetite for retaliation at the Foreign Office, where there is a recognition that Britain has few options left in the row.

Each and every Russian member of staff at the British Council was either questioned yesterday by the FSB, or received a late-night home visit from an interior ministry official. They were apparently told in no uncertain terms that their jobs were illegal, and that if they continued to work for the British Council, they would be breaking the law.

The British Council, in their statement, are likely to stress that their decision was motivated by a desire to ensure the safety of their staff - and quite rightly so. As I mentioned in my previous post, the Council’s British staff can just go home at the end of this dispute - the Council’s Russian staff have to stay and face any consequences.

One thing that hasn’t been raised is what the immediate future of Russian British Council staff members - I’m sure the Council will do what it can fothem, but in the very near future, they will officially lose their jobs, and their monthly paychecks.

Overall, I agree with the British Council’s decision at this point. Any responsible employer would do the same. The British Council played the hand they were dealt as well as they could, but ultimately it was a weak hand - the Russian government held all the aces.

According to the BBC, the British Council plan to take the ‘moral high ground’ over this issue - to stress that this is Russia’s loss, rather than Britain’s.

This may play on the international stage but, on the Russian domestic stage, I think this will look very much like a victory for Russia, and a triumph for Putin and Medvedev in the run up to March’s Presidential election.

Update: Both the British Council and British Foreign Minister David Miliband have issued statements on the issue. Here are a couple of hefty excerpts:

British Council statement (pdf):

At the start of this week the Russian Government initiated a campaign of intimidation against our staff in St Petersburg and Yekaterinburg.

On Tuesday 15 January, the Russian State Security Services (FSB) summoned over 20 Russian staff to attend individual interviews.

Late that night 10 members of staff were visited at home by the Russian tax police and called to further interviews yesterday.

The interviews had little to do with their work and were clearly aimed at exerting undue pressure on innocent individuals.

Our paramount consideration is the wellbeing of our staff and I feel we cannot continue our work without significant risk to them.

David Miliband statement to Parliament:

The Russian security services summoned over 20 locally-engaged members of British Council staff in St Petersburg and Yekaterinburg one by one for interviews. 10 members of staff were interviewed late at night in their homes after calls by the Russian tax police. Questioning ranged from the institutional status of the British Council to personal questions about the health and welfare of family pets.

Mr Speaker, these Russian citizens have chosen to offer their skills and hard work to promote cultural contact between the people of Russia and the UK. As a result, they have been the subject of blatant intimidation from their own government.

Mr Speaker, I think the whole House will agree that such actions are reprehensible, not worthy of a great country, and contrary to the letter and spirit of the legal framework under which the British Council operates - notably international law, including the Vienna Conventions, and the UK/Russia 1994 bilateral agreement on cultural cooperation which Russia has ratified.

Russia has failed to show any legal reasons under Russian or international law why the British Council should not continue to operate. Russia has also failed to substantiate its claims that the British Council is avoiding paying tax. The British Council is in fact registered for tax in Russia and has complied with all requests of the tax authorities in respect of its activities. Therefore, instead of taking legal action against the Council, they have resorted to intimidation of the Council’s staff.

Later on in his statement, Miliband (correctly, but rather smugly, it seemed to me) outlined the moral high ground that Britain plans to occupy:

We regard as entirely separate issues Mr Litvinenko’s murder and the activities of the British Council to build up links between British and Russian schools and universities, to support English language teaching in Russia and Russian studies in the UK, and to promote the best of British drama, writing, music, and art.

Nor do we believe that cultural activities should become a political football; in fact educational and cultural activities are important ways of bringing people together. That is why I have decided not to take similar action against Russia’s cultural activities in the UK, for example by sending back Russian masterpieces scheduled for show at the Royal Academy, or by taking measures against the two Russian diplomats at the Russian Embassy dedicated to cultural work.

We have nothing to fear from these contacts; we welcome and encourage them.

Comments (7)

Tags: ,

New Year, New Look

Posted on 16 January 2008 by Andy

Siberian LightTo belatedly celebrate Russia’s Old New Year, Siberian Light has a new look.

Ditching the traditional blog layout of one post after another, newest at the top, I’ve decided to go with a magazine style design which, I hope will make Siberian Light much easier on the eye and much easier to navigate.

The magazine style format lends itself to featuring some articles more prominently than others. I plan to start writing a few more in depth articles over the coming weeks and months, interspersed with more traditional, shorter, blog posts, so I felt I needed a way to highlight those posts that would be of interest to readers for longer than the current day’s hot news story.

As far as I can see, most everything is working properly. However, I haven’t had chance to check the site in a few web-browsers, so if you spot any glitches, please do let me know.

Anyway, here’s a quick guide to the new features.

Featured Articles

The focus of the new Siberian Light homepage is the latest featured post. A big picture right in the middle of the page means you shouldn’t be able to miss it. And, just underneath the latest featured article, you’ll find a series of smaller pictures - click on these, and details of earlier featured articles will be brought to the fore.

Click on the title of any of these featured articles, or the ‘continue reading’ link, and you’ll be taken the article itself.

A few of Siberian Light’s older posts are already featured - keep an eye out for the next one in a few days.

Regular Blog Posts

Just because there will be more features at Siberian Light doesn’t mean there will be less regular blog posts. Right underneath the featured articles, you’ll find links to the 10 latest blog posts, with a brief introduction to each post.

The Sidebar

The sidebar on the right has been completely revamped. The big grey box you see is to help you navigate around the site. It contains details of the most popular recent posts (ranked by a behind the scenes formula), the posts with the most comments, a list of featured articles, and a tag cloud which you can use to navigate the site by topic.

Below the navigation box, you’ll find a more traditional sidebar, with links to other blogs about Russia, as well as links to the Siberian Light archives. These are sorted by both category and month - click on the title to reveal the links below.

Oh, and there are a few colourful ads rotating around the sidebar help to pay the hosting costs for Siberian Light.

Subscribe!

Did you know that you can subscribe to Siberian Light? You can either choose to receive a daily email digest of posts, straight to your inbox, or you can have every post delivered almost instantaneously to your RSS feed reader of choice. Subscription options are at the top right of the page, next to the big orange RSS button.

Comments (9)

Tags: , , ,

British Gov’t: Russia intimidating British Council staff

Posted on 16 January 2008 by Andy

British Council logoThe British Government has today accused the Russian authorities of the “intimidation and harassment of British officials.”

The accusations come after many of the Council’s Russian staff were questioned yesterday by the FSB.

Every other Russian member of the Council’s staff was reportedly visited at their homes late at night by Interior Ministry officials, although no reports of the conversations that took place have emerged yet.

Stephen Kinnock, a Director of the British Council, and son of Neil Kinnock, a prominent former British politician, was also arrested by Russian police late last night for a breach of traffic regulations. He was briefly held at a St Petersburg police station before being collected by the British Counsul General.

The British Government is, as you would imagine, not happy. The Russian Ambassador was summoned to receive a formal protest, and the Foreign Minister David Miliband told press:

“Any intimidation or harassment of officials is obviously completely unacceptable.

“The only losers from any attack on the British Council are Russian citizens who want to use the British Council - and the reputation of the Russian government.”

The British Council have also issued a comment to the press:

“Our main concern is for the safety and security of our Russian and UK staff. We are deeply concerned by these incidents,” said a statement from the council this morning.

“We can confirm that last night Stephen Kinnock was followed, stopped and subsequently released an hour later by Russian authorities.

“We can also confirm that our Russian national staff, in both St Petersburg and Yekaterinburg, were yesterday summoned for interview by the FSB at their headquarters and subsequently visited in their homes late last night by officials of the Russian ministry of interior.”

Quite rightly, the British Council have focused on the welfare of the Russian national staff who work for them. Because they’ll be feeling much more nervous today than the Council’s British employees, who will just be reassigned to another country at the end of this affair.

Comments (3)

Tags: , ,

British Council opens in defiance of Russian ban

Posted on 16 January 2008 by Andy

British Council logoThe British Council has this week opened its offices in St Petersburg and Yekaterinburg in defiance of the Russian goverment’s order that the offices be closed.

The decision ratchets up Russo-British tensions another notch although, so far, the disagreement seems to be limited to a war of words - British Foreign Minister David Miliband accused Russia of holding the Council “hostage”; his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov hit back by accusing Britain of “nostalgia for colonial times”.

However, I’m not sure that this dispute will remain a war of words for much longer - at some point, it is bound to escalate. The British Council has clearly set out its position, so the ball is now in Russia’s court - in order to not seem incompetent it either needs to take action through the courts, or through more direct means.

The British Ambassador was summoned to the Kremlin earlier this week to explain his country’s actions. He told the Press Association that, while there, he had:

he had been presented with a “long piece of paper” setting out the Russians’ view of the legal position.

This would seem to indicate legal action of some kind, but it isn’t quite clear what form this action would take. The Russian authorities have hinted that they would soon attempt to claim back taxes from the British Council and bar its employees from receiving new visas, but this seems to be a rather long term approach.

I wonder how long the Kremlin can really allow the British Council offices to remain defiantly open before the Russian Government begins to seem impotent in the eyes of its people - particularly in the run-up to a critical Presidential election…

Comments (1)

Mothers of Beslan victims charged with ‘Extremism’

Posted on 14 January 2008 by Andy

A Russian Court will today consider whether the Voice of Beslan - an organisation led by grieving Russian mothers who lost their children in the 2004 Beslan seige - should be outlawed as an extremist organisation.

Their extremist crime? To accuse President Putin of being complicit in the deaths of their children.

The Moscow Times provides some background on the open letter that triggered this prosecution:

The 2005 letter, addressed to “Everyone sympathetic to Beslan’s tragedy” and posted on the group’s web site, says “none of the acts of terrorism that occurred during Putin’s presidency has been investigated properly” and that Putin has become “the guarantor for the terrorists” by not punishing senior officials for the botched Beslan rescue operation.

I cannot think of a more graphic demonstration of the weakness of the current regime, and its over-sensitivity to criticism than this prosecution.

True, under Russian law, such criticism of the President is technically illegal - the law was amended in 2006 to bring public slander of a government official within the legal definition of extremism,

But has anyone considered whether this prosecution is actually in the public interest? How will the Russian public be served by prosecuting a protest group led by greiving mothers?

Surely (and assuming that Putin isn’t complicit), the most sensible way forward for the Russian authorities is to accept that grief causes mothers who have lost their children to lash out, and accept this as a natural expression of their anguish?

Instead, by prosecuting these mothers as extremists all Russia does is trivialise its, and the world’s, ongoing struggle against real terrorists.

Comments (8)

Russia Blog roundup

Posted on 11 January 2008 by Andy

This week’s roundup of the best blog posts about Russia.

Yakov Alexandrovich SlashchovOn January 11 1929, famous Russian White General Yakov Alexandrovich Slashchov was murdered in Moscow. De Rebus Antiqus Et Novis tells us his story.

Continuing the theme of murderous anniversaries, Executed Today brings us the story of Cossack rebel Yemelyan Pugachev. He led a revolt against Catherine the Great and, when his revolt failed, Catherine ordered that he be chopped to death on January 10 1775. Nice.

(By the way, Executed Today has been nominated for a couple of awards, including one for ‘Freakiest Blogger’. Both nominations are well deserved - go vote.)

Marginalia reports on the latest shenanigans of Russia’s wealthy:

“Latvia is embroiled in a stunning scandal once again — the sale of perhaps a hundred passports to wealthy individuals, mostly Russian citizens seeking to take advantage of Latvia’s EU and Schengen membership.”

Langour Management has translated The Hyena, a nasty little children’s poem by Sasha Chernyi. Here’s a short excerpt:

The hyena is a vile creature:
With its impudent muzzle
and hide sticking out of its nape.

An anonymous guest author discusses belt tightening reforms in Russia’s pshychiatric services.

Some of the major developments in the Russian military during 2007 are covered over at Russian Forces blog.

Sean ponders the search for Putin’s soul.

Is Putin really rich? The Accidental Russophile investigates and concludes:

“No matter how you slice it, something doesn’t match up with Putin’s lifestyle and is declared wealth.”

Dinc, the mastermind behind the Turkish Invasion of Russia has admitted temporary defeat:

I am deeply sorry to announce on the 637th day, 14th hour and 8th minute of the Turkish Invasion of Russia that the Invasion is now officially over and Dinc will be kicked back to motherland on 15th January 2008…

And, finally, the latest addition to the Russophile clan:

My sister-in-law told us at dinner proudly that her two-year old daughter knows who the president of Russia is — She learned this while the television was tuned to the news. My sister-in-law turns to her daughter and asks (in Russian) “Who is our President?” My niece answers in a small voice, “Putia.” She can’t say the letter N very well, so it sounds like it might be an insult. It is not. You can see she is quite proud because she knows that she is answering the question correctly for all the adults. Everyone chuckles and she smiles.

More next week.

Comments (5)

January 9 in Russian History…

Posted on 09 January 2008 by Andy

…The day on which Russian history blog De Rebus Antiquis Et Novis was founded. Happy first birthday!!

Comments (2)

Russian Winter Festival in London

Posted on 08 January 2008 by Andy

If you’re in London this Saturday 13 January, why not pop along to the London Russian Winter Festival in Trafalgar Square?

The Winter Festival is a free event, held every year to celebrate the Russian Old New Year and attracts a wide range of people, from curious locals to homesick Russians living in London.

This year’s festival seems to have pretty wide and varied programme, including music from pop group Fabrika and folk group Slavyanye, and dancing by the Buryat National Dance Ensemble Baikal.

The highlight for me, though, will be the festival’s showcase rock bands - Alisa, Sankt Peterburg and Zemlyane. All founded during the 70s and 80s, they represent some of the best of Soviet rock.

So, to whet you’re appetites, here’s a short video of Nebo Slavjan (Sky of Slavs), by Alisa

Comments (3)

Advertise Here

INFORMATION